Review





Similar Products

95
Thermo Fisher gene exp drd2 rn00561126 m1
Sympathoadrenal response and dopaminergic action with agonist bromocriptine (A–C) Recurrent BROMO administration in i.c.v. reduced food intake and BG response. (A) Schematic diagram of recurrent aCSF ( n = 7) or recurrent BROMO ( n = 7, 2 μg) for 3 days into i.c.v. (B) BG on day 4 following singular injection of INS (15 U/kg NPH) Groups were compared via two-way ANOVA. (C) Cumulative food intake after INS injection (∗ p < 0.005 RBROMO i.c.v. vs. RCSF i.c.v. + INS). Groups were compared via unpaired t test. Each bar represents the mean + SEM. (D–H) Recurrent BROMO administration in i.c.v. and effects on CRR. (D) Schematic diagram of recurrent aCSF ( n = 7) or recurrent BROMO ( n = 7, 2 μg) into i.c.v.. (E) BG during hyperinsulinemic-hypoglycemic clamp where BG is held at 40–45 mg/dL for 90 min. Groups were compared via two-way ANOVA. (F) Ginf. Rate during clamp (∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001 vs. RBROMO). Groups were compared via unpaired t test. (G) Peak epinephrine concentrations at basal and hypoglycemia (∗ p < 0.005 RCSF vs. RBROMO). Groups were compared via two-way ANOVA. (H) Peak glucagon concentrations at basal and hypoglycemia (∗ p < 0.005 RCSF vs. RBROMO). Groups were compared via two-way ANOVA. Each bar represents the mean + SEM. (I) Dopaminergic gene expression in VTA. Relative gene product expression of COMT, DDC, <t>DRD2,</t> SLC6A3 in the ventral tegmental area following 3-day treatment with RS ( n = 6), RH ( n = 7), or RH + MET ( n = 6) (∗ p < 0.04 RS vs. RH + MET; # p < 0.04 RH vs. RH + MET). Groups were compared via one-way ANOVA. Each bar represents the mean + SEM. (J–O) Recurrent BROMO infusion in VTA effects on CRR. (J) Schematic diagram of recurrent aCSF ( n = 7) or recurrent BROMO (n = 7–9, 5 μg/day; infusion rate 0.1 μL/min). (K) BG concentration during hyperinsulinemic-hypoglycemic clamp, which held BG at 40–50 mg/dL for 90 min. Groups were compared via two-way ANOVA. (L) Ginf. rate during clamp (∗∗∗∗ p < 0.001 RCSF vs. RBROMO). Groups were compared via two-way ANOVA. (M) Peak epinephrine concentrations at basal and hypoglycemia (∗ p < 0.05 BROMO vs. SAL). Groups were analyzed via unpaired t test. (N) Relative gene expression of DRD2 in the ventral tegmental area following a 3-day treatment with either aCSF or BROMO directly into the VTA (∗ p < 0.05 aCSF vs. BROMO). Groups were compared via unpaired t test. (O) Relative gene expression of SLC6A3 in the ventral tegmental area following a 3-day treatment with either aCSF or BROMO directly into the VTA ( p = 0.21). Groups were compared via unpaired t test. Each bar represents the mean + SEM.
Gene Exp Drd2 Rn00561126 M1, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gene exp drd2 rn00561126 m1/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gene exp drd2 rn00561126 m1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Thermo Fisher gene exp drd2 hs00241436 m1
Sympathoadrenal response and dopaminergic action with agonist bromocriptine (A–C) Recurrent BROMO administration in i.c.v. reduced food intake and BG response. (A) Schematic diagram of recurrent aCSF ( n = 7) or recurrent BROMO ( n = 7, 2 μg) for 3 days into i.c.v. (B) BG on day 4 following singular injection of INS (15 U/kg NPH) Groups were compared via two-way ANOVA. (C) Cumulative food intake after INS injection (∗ p < 0.005 RBROMO i.c.v. vs. RCSF i.c.v. + INS). Groups were compared via unpaired t test. Each bar represents the mean + SEM. (D–H) Recurrent BROMO administration in i.c.v. and effects on CRR. (D) Schematic diagram of recurrent aCSF ( n = 7) or recurrent BROMO ( n = 7, 2 μg) into i.c.v.. (E) BG during hyperinsulinemic-hypoglycemic clamp where BG is held at 40–45 mg/dL for 90 min. Groups were compared via two-way ANOVA. (F) Ginf. Rate during clamp (∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001 vs. RBROMO). Groups were compared via unpaired t test. (G) Peak epinephrine concentrations at basal and hypoglycemia (∗ p < 0.005 RCSF vs. RBROMO). Groups were compared via two-way ANOVA. (H) Peak glucagon concentrations at basal and hypoglycemia (∗ p < 0.005 RCSF vs. RBROMO). Groups were compared via two-way ANOVA. Each bar represents the mean + SEM. (I) Dopaminergic gene expression in VTA. Relative gene product expression of COMT, DDC, <t>DRD2,</t> SLC6A3 in the ventral tegmental area following 3-day treatment with RS ( n = 6), RH ( n = 7), or RH + MET ( n = 6) (∗ p < 0.04 RS vs. RH + MET; # p < 0.04 RH vs. RH + MET). Groups were compared via one-way ANOVA. Each bar represents the mean + SEM. (J–O) Recurrent BROMO infusion in VTA effects on CRR. (J) Schematic diagram of recurrent aCSF ( n = 7) or recurrent BROMO (n = 7–9, 5 μg/day; infusion rate 0.1 μL/min). (K) BG concentration during hyperinsulinemic-hypoglycemic clamp, which held BG at 40–50 mg/dL for 90 min. Groups were compared via two-way ANOVA. (L) Ginf. rate during clamp (∗∗∗∗ p < 0.001 RCSF vs. RBROMO). Groups were compared via two-way ANOVA. (M) Peak epinephrine concentrations at basal and hypoglycemia (∗ p < 0.05 BROMO vs. SAL). Groups were analyzed via unpaired t test. (N) Relative gene expression of DRD2 in the ventral tegmental area following a 3-day treatment with either aCSF or BROMO directly into the VTA (∗ p < 0.05 aCSF vs. BROMO). Groups were compared via unpaired t test. (O) Relative gene expression of SLC6A3 in the ventral tegmental area following a 3-day treatment with either aCSF or BROMO directly into the VTA ( p = 0.21). Groups were compared via unpaired t test. Each bar represents the mean + SEM.
Gene Exp Drd2 Hs00241436 M1, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gene exp drd2 hs00241436 m1/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gene exp drd2 hs00241436 m1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Thermo Fisher snp drd2 c 7486676 10
Sympathoadrenal response and dopaminergic action with agonist bromocriptine (A–C) Recurrent BROMO administration in i.c.v. reduced food intake and BG response. (A) Schematic diagram of recurrent aCSF ( n = 7) or recurrent BROMO ( n = 7, 2 μg) for 3 days into i.c.v. (B) BG on day 4 following singular injection of INS (15 U/kg NPH) Groups were compared via two-way ANOVA. (C) Cumulative food intake after INS injection (∗ p < 0.005 RBROMO i.c.v. vs. RCSF i.c.v. + INS). Groups were compared via unpaired t test. Each bar represents the mean + SEM. (D–H) Recurrent BROMO administration in i.c.v. and effects on CRR. (D) Schematic diagram of recurrent aCSF ( n = 7) or recurrent BROMO ( n = 7, 2 μg) into i.c.v.. (E) BG during hyperinsulinemic-hypoglycemic clamp where BG is held at 40–45 mg/dL for 90 min. Groups were compared via two-way ANOVA. (F) Ginf. Rate during clamp (∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001 vs. RBROMO). Groups were compared via unpaired t test. (G) Peak epinephrine concentrations at basal and hypoglycemia (∗ p < 0.005 RCSF vs. RBROMO). Groups were compared via two-way ANOVA. (H) Peak glucagon concentrations at basal and hypoglycemia (∗ p < 0.005 RCSF vs. RBROMO). Groups were compared via two-way ANOVA. Each bar represents the mean + SEM. (I) Dopaminergic gene expression in VTA. Relative gene product expression of COMT, DDC, <t>DRD2,</t> SLC6A3 in the ventral tegmental area following 3-day treatment with RS ( n = 6), RH ( n = 7), or RH + MET ( n = 6) (∗ p < 0.04 RS vs. RH + MET; # p < 0.04 RH vs. RH + MET). Groups were compared via one-way ANOVA. Each bar represents the mean + SEM. (J–O) Recurrent BROMO infusion in VTA effects on CRR. (J) Schematic diagram of recurrent aCSF ( n = 7) or recurrent BROMO (n = 7–9, 5 μg/day; infusion rate 0.1 μL/min). (K) BG concentration during hyperinsulinemic-hypoglycemic clamp, which held BG at 40–50 mg/dL for 90 min. Groups were compared via two-way ANOVA. (L) Ginf. rate during clamp (∗∗∗∗ p < 0.001 RCSF vs. RBROMO). Groups were compared via two-way ANOVA. (M) Peak epinephrine concentrations at basal and hypoglycemia (∗ p < 0.05 BROMO vs. SAL). Groups were analyzed via unpaired t test. (N) Relative gene expression of DRD2 in the ventral tegmental area following a 3-day treatment with either aCSF or BROMO directly into the VTA (∗ p < 0.05 aCSF vs. BROMO). Groups were compared via unpaired t test. (O) Relative gene expression of SLC6A3 in the ventral tegmental area following a 3-day treatment with either aCSF or BROMO directly into the VTA ( p = 0.21). Groups were compared via unpaired t test. Each bar represents the mean + SEM.
Snp Drd2 C 7486676 10, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/snp drd2 c 7486676 10/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
snp drd2 c 7486676 10 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Proteintech d2r
Sympathoadrenal response and dopaminergic action with agonist bromocriptine (A–C) Recurrent BROMO administration in i.c.v. reduced food intake and BG response. (A) Schematic diagram of recurrent aCSF ( n = 7) or recurrent BROMO ( n = 7, 2 μg) for 3 days into i.c.v. (B) BG on day 4 following singular injection of INS (15 U/kg NPH) Groups were compared via two-way ANOVA. (C) Cumulative food intake after INS injection (∗ p < 0.005 RBROMO i.c.v. vs. RCSF i.c.v. + INS). Groups were compared via unpaired t test. Each bar represents the mean + SEM. (D–H) Recurrent BROMO administration in i.c.v. and effects on CRR. (D) Schematic diagram of recurrent aCSF ( n = 7) or recurrent BROMO ( n = 7, 2 μg) into i.c.v.. (E) BG during hyperinsulinemic-hypoglycemic clamp where BG is held at 40–45 mg/dL for 90 min. Groups were compared via two-way ANOVA. (F) Ginf. Rate during clamp (∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001 vs. RBROMO). Groups were compared via unpaired t test. (G) Peak epinephrine concentrations at basal and hypoglycemia (∗ p < 0.005 RCSF vs. RBROMO). Groups were compared via two-way ANOVA. (H) Peak glucagon concentrations at basal and hypoglycemia (∗ p < 0.005 RCSF vs. RBROMO). Groups were compared via two-way ANOVA. Each bar represents the mean + SEM. (I) Dopaminergic gene expression in VTA. Relative gene product expression of COMT, DDC, <t>DRD2,</t> SLC6A3 in the ventral tegmental area following 3-day treatment with RS ( n = 6), RH ( n = 7), or RH + MET ( n = 6) (∗ p < 0.04 RS vs. RH + MET; # p < 0.04 RH vs. RH + MET). Groups were compared via one-way ANOVA. Each bar represents the mean + SEM. (J–O) Recurrent BROMO infusion in VTA effects on CRR. (J) Schematic diagram of recurrent aCSF ( n = 7) or recurrent BROMO (n = 7–9, 5 μg/day; infusion rate 0.1 μL/min). (K) BG concentration during hyperinsulinemic-hypoglycemic clamp, which held BG at 40–50 mg/dL for 90 min. Groups were compared via two-way ANOVA. (L) Ginf. rate during clamp (∗∗∗∗ p < 0.001 RCSF vs. RBROMO). Groups were compared via two-way ANOVA. (M) Peak epinephrine concentrations at basal and hypoglycemia (∗ p < 0.05 BROMO vs. SAL). Groups were analyzed via unpaired t test. (N) Relative gene expression of DRD2 in the ventral tegmental area following a 3-day treatment with either aCSF or BROMO directly into the VTA (∗ p < 0.05 aCSF vs. BROMO). Groups were compared via unpaired t test. (O) Relative gene expression of SLC6A3 in the ventral tegmental area following a 3-day treatment with either aCSF or BROMO directly into the VTA ( p = 0.21). Groups were compared via unpaired t test. Each bar represents the mean + SEM.
D2r, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/d2r/product/Proteintech
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
d2r - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Thermo Fisher gene exp drd2 mm00438541 m1
(A) Cocaine abstinence does not alter mRNA abundance for the <t>dopamine</t> <t>D2</t> <t>receptor</t> gene ( <t>Drd2</t> ) in D2-PenkKOs (saline, n = 7; cocaine, n = 7) or littermate Penk f/f controls (saline, n = 10; cocaine, n = 10). (B, D) Example traces of optogenetically-evoked inhibitory post synaptic currents (oIPSC) originating from D2-MSN and recorded in D1-MSNs. Adora2a-Cre controls (B) and D2-PenkKOs (D) were 14 days abstinent from repeated saline or cocaine at the time of recording. (C, E) Quinpirole dose-dependently inhibited oIPSC amplitude in Adora2a-Cre controls (saline: 18 cells/7 mice, cocaine: 13 cells/6 mice) and D2-PenkKOs (saline: 8 cells/3 mice, cocaine: 7 cells/3 mice) (Quinpirole x Cocaine interaction, p < 0.0001). However, quinpirole was less effective at suppressing oIPSCs in cocaine-abstinent mice than the saline-abstinent group. Asterisks represent post-hoc t-tests comparing saline versus cocaine groups and were collapsed across genotype. * p < 0.05: saline vs. cocaine for 0.25 and 0.5 µM. ** p < 0.01: saline vs. cocaine for 1 µM. Data are shown as mean ± SEM, with individual data points labeled as male (circles) and females (triangles).
Gene Exp Drd2 Mm00438541 M1, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gene exp drd2 mm00438541 m1/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gene exp drd2 mm00438541 m1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Thermo Fisher gene exp drd2 oa04895884 m1
a , Schematic of the principal contributors to striatal D2/3 ligand binding: postsynaptic D2 heteroreceptors on medium spiny neurons (MSNs; red) and presynaptic D2 autoreceptors on dopamine axons (blue). b , Breeding strategy generating littermates with cell-type–specific <t>Drd2</t> haploinsufficiency. Genotypes: control (Drd2 loxP/wt ; black), autoD2KD (Drd2 loxP/wt ; Dat IRES-Cre/wt ; blue), MSN-D2KD (Drd2 loxP/wt ; Adora2a-Cre +/– ; red), and double-D2KD (Drd2 flox/wt ; Adora2a-Cre +/– ; Dat IRES-Cre/wt ; purple). Bottom, RT–qPCR quantification of Drd2 mRNA (ΔΔCt) in frontal cortex (open), nucleus accumbens (NAc; dark), and dorsal striatum (light) (n = 5 control; n = 3–5 autoD2KD; n = 5 MSN-D2KD; n = 3–5 double-D2KD). c, e , Representative autoradiographs of [3H]raclopride binding (c) and [3H]SCH23390 binding (e), including nonspecific binding. Color scale indicates nCi/g. Autoradiography was performed in two independent cohorts, each with its own control group; representative control images are therefore shown twice. d, f , Left, schematic of striatal regions of interest used for quantification. Right, specific binding in dorsal striatum and NAc, normalized to the mean of the corresponding control region, for [3H]raclopride (d) and [3H]SCH23390 (f). Symbols denote individual mice; bars show mean ± s.e.m. For binding quantification, n = 3–9 mice per genotype; 8–12 sections per mouse; 24–30 ROIs per animal. *P ≤ 0.05; #0.1 ≥ P > 0.05.
Gene Exp Drd2 Oa04895884 M1, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gene exp drd2 oa04895884 m1/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gene exp drd2 oa04895884 m1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Sympathoadrenal response and dopaminergic action with agonist bromocriptine (A–C) Recurrent BROMO administration in i.c.v. reduced food intake and BG response. (A) Schematic diagram of recurrent aCSF ( n = 7) or recurrent BROMO ( n = 7, 2 μg) for 3 days into i.c.v. (B) BG on day 4 following singular injection of INS (15 U/kg NPH) Groups were compared via two-way ANOVA. (C) Cumulative food intake after INS injection (∗ p < 0.005 RBROMO i.c.v. vs. RCSF i.c.v. + INS). Groups were compared via unpaired t test. Each bar represents the mean + SEM. (D–H) Recurrent BROMO administration in i.c.v. and effects on CRR. (D) Schematic diagram of recurrent aCSF ( n = 7) or recurrent BROMO ( n = 7, 2 μg) into i.c.v.. (E) BG during hyperinsulinemic-hypoglycemic clamp where BG is held at 40–45 mg/dL for 90 min. Groups were compared via two-way ANOVA. (F) Ginf. Rate during clamp (∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001 vs. RBROMO). Groups were compared via unpaired t test. (G) Peak epinephrine concentrations at basal and hypoglycemia (∗ p < 0.005 RCSF vs. RBROMO). Groups were compared via two-way ANOVA. (H) Peak glucagon concentrations at basal and hypoglycemia (∗ p < 0.005 RCSF vs. RBROMO). Groups were compared via two-way ANOVA. Each bar represents the mean + SEM. (I) Dopaminergic gene expression in VTA. Relative gene product expression of COMT, DDC, DRD2, SLC6A3 in the ventral tegmental area following 3-day treatment with RS ( n = 6), RH ( n = 7), or RH + MET ( n = 6) (∗ p < 0.04 RS vs. RH + MET; # p < 0.04 RH vs. RH + MET). Groups were compared via one-way ANOVA. Each bar represents the mean + SEM. (J–O) Recurrent BROMO infusion in VTA effects on CRR. (J) Schematic diagram of recurrent aCSF ( n = 7) or recurrent BROMO (n = 7–9, 5 μg/day; infusion rate 0.1 μL/min). (K) BG concentration during hyperinsulinemic-hypoglycemic clamp, which held BG at 40–50 mg/dL for 90 min. Groups were compared via two-way ANOVA. (L) Ginf. rate during clamp (∗∗∗∗ p < 0.001 RCSF vs. RBROMO). Groups were compared via two-way ANOVA. (M) Peak epinephrine concentrations at basal and hypoglycemia (∗ p < 0.05 BROMO vs. SAL). Groups were analyzed via unpaired t test. (N) Relative gene expression of DRD2 in the ventral tegmental area following a 3-day treatment with either aCSF or BROMO directly into the VTA (∗ p < 0.05 aCSF vs. BROMO). Groups were compared via unpaired t test. (O) Relative gene expression of SLC6A3 in the ventral tegmental area following a 3-day treatment with either aCSF or BROMO directly into the VTA ( p = 0.21). Groups were compared via unpaired t test. Each bar represents the mean + SEM.

Journal: Cell Reports Medicine

Article Title: Role of dopamine in the development of impaired counterregulation and impaired awareness of hypoglycemia

doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2026.102710

Figure Lengend Snippet: Sympathoadrenal response and dopaminergic action with agonist bromocriptine (A–C) Recurrent BROMO administration in i.c.v. reduced food intake and BG response. (A) Schematic diagram of recurrent aCSF ( n = 7) or recurrent BROMO ( n = 7, 2 μg) for 3 days into i.c.v. (B) BG on day 4 following singular injection of INS (15 U/kg NPH) Groups were compared via two-way ANOVA. (C) Cumulative food intake after INS injection (∗ p < 0.005 RBROMO i.c.v. vs. RCSF i.c.v. + INS). Groups were compared via unpaired t test. Each bar represents the mean + SEM. (D–H) Recurrent BROMO administration in i.c.v. and effects on CRR. (D) Schematic diagram of recurrent aCSF ( n = 7) or recurrent BROMO ( n = 7, 2 μg) into i.c.v.. (E) BG during hyperinsulinemic-hypoglycemic clamp where BG is held at 40–45 mg/dL for 90 min. Groups were compared via two-way ANOVA. (F) Ginf. Rate during clamp (∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001 vs. RBROMO). Groups were compared via unpaired t test. (G) Peak epinephrine concentrations at basal and hypoglycemia (∗ p < 0.005 RCSF vs. RBROMO). Groups were compared via two-way ANOVA. (H) Peak glucagon concentrations at basal and hypoglycemia (∗ p < 0.005 RCSF vs. RBROMO). Groups were compared via two-way ANOVA. Each bar represents the mean + SEM. (I) Dopaminergic gene expression in VTA. Relative gene product expression of COMT, DDC, DRD2, SLC6A3 in the ventral tegmental area following 3-day treatment with RS ( n = 6), RH ( n = 7), or RH + MET ( n = 6) (∗ p < 0.04 RS vs. RH + MET; # p < 0.04 RH vs. RH + MET). Groups were compared via one-way ANOVA. Each bar represents the mean + SEM. (J–O) Recurrent BROMO infusion in VTA effects on CRR. (J) Schematic diagram of recurrent aCSF ( n = 7) or recurrent BROMO (n = 7–9, 5 μg/day; infusion rate 0.1 μL/min). (K) BG concentration during hyperinsulinemic-hypoglycemic clamp, which held BG at 40–50 mg/dL for 90 min. Groups were compared via two-way ANOVA. (L) Ginf. rate during clamp (∗∗∗∗ p < 0.001 RCSF vs. RBROMO). Groups were compared via two-way ANOVA. (M) Peak epinephrine concentrations at basal and hypoglycemia (∗ p < 0.05 BROMO vs. SAL). Groups were analyzed via unpaired t test. (N) Relative gene expression of DRD2 in the ventral tegmental area following a 3-day treatment with either aCSF or BROMO directly into the VTA (∗ p < 0.05 aCSF vs. BROMO). Groups were compared via unpaired t test. (O) Relative gene expression of SLC6A3 in the ventral tegmental area following a 3-day treatment with either aCSF or BROMO directly into the VTA ( p = 0.21). Groups were compared via unpaired t test. Each bar represents the mean + SEM.

Article Snippet: In brief, total RNA was extracted and purified from brain regions using miRNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, CA) which was reverse transcribed and then amplified by real-time PCR using Taqman gene assays (Thermo Fisher) for dopamine receptor D2 ( Drd2 ; assay ID: Rn00561126_m1), dopamine transporter or solute carrier family 6, member 3 ( Dat or Slc6a3 ; assay ID: Rn00562224_m1), dopa decarboxylase ( Ddc : assay ID: Rn01401189_m1), catechol- O -methyltransferase ( Comt ; assay ID: Rn00561037_m1) and the housekeeping gene beta-actin ( Actb ; assay ID: Rn00667869_m1).

Techniques: Injection, Gene Expression, Expressing, Concentration Assay

(A) Cocaine abstinence does not alter mRNA abundance for the dopamine D2 receptor gene ( Drd2 ) in D2-PenkKOs (saline, n = 7; cocaine, n = 7) or littermate Penk f/f controls (saline, n = 10; cocaine, n = 10). (B, D) Example traces of optogenetically-evoked inhibitory post synaptic currents (oIPSC) originating from D2-MSN and recorded in D1-MSNs. Adora2a-Cre controls (B) and D2-PenkKOs (D) were 14 days abstinent from repeated saline or cocaine at the time of recording. (C, E) Quinpirole dose-dependently inhibited oIPSC amplitude in Adora2a-Cre controls (saline: 18 cells/7 mice, cocaine: 13 cells/6 mice) and D2-PenkKOs (saline: 8 cells/3 mice, cocaine: 7 cells/3 mice) (Quinpirole x Cocaine interaction, p < 0.0001). However, quinpirole was less effective at suppressing oIPSCs in cocaine-abstinent mice than the saline-abstinent group. Asterisks represent post-hoc t-tests comparing saline versus cocaine groups and were collapsed across genotype. * p < 0.05: saline vs. cocaine for 0.25 and 0.5 µM. ** p < 0.01: saline vs. cocaine for 1 µM. Data are shown as mean ± SEM, with individual data points labeled as male (circles) and females (triangles).

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Enkephalin Gates D2-MSN Disinhibition of the Ventral Pallidum During Cocaine Abstinence

doi: 10.64898/2026.03.11.711212

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Cocaine abstinence does not alter mRNA abundance for the dopamine D2 receptor gene ( Drd2 ) in D2-PenkKOs (saline, n = 7; cocaine, n = 7) or littermate Penk f/f controls (saline, n = 10; cocaine, n = 10). (B, D) Example traces of optogenetically-evoked inhibitory post synaptic currents (oIPSC) originating from D2-MSN and recorded in D1-MSNs. Adora2a-Cre controls (B) and D2-PenkKOs (D) were 14 days abstinent from repeated saline or cocaine at the time of recording. (C, E) Quinpirole dose-dependently inhibited oIPSC amplitude in Adora2a-Cre controls (saline: 18 cells/7 mice, cocaine: 13 cells/6 mice) and D2-PenkKOs (saline: 8 cells/3 mice, cocaine: 7 cells/3 mice) (Quinpirole x Cocaine interaction, p < 0.0001). However, quinpirole was less effective at suppressing oIPSCs in cocaine-abstinent mice than the saline-abstinent group. Asterisks represent post-hoc t-tests comparing saline versus cocaine groups and were collapsed across genotype. * p < 0.05: saline vs. cocaine for 0.25 and 0.5 µM. ** p < 0.01: saline vs. cocaine for 1 µM. Data are shown as mean ± SEM, with individual data points labeled as male (circles) and females (triangles).

Article Snippet: Relative mRNA abundance of proenkephalin ( Penk , Mm01212875_m1), dopamine D2 receptor ( Drd2 , Mm00438541_m1), and β-actin ( Actb, Mm01205647_g1) were determined with TaqMan Gene Expression Assay using a CFX384 Real-Time System (initial hold at 95 °C for 20 sec, 40 cycles at 95 °C for 1 sec, and 60 °C for 20 sec).

Techniques: Saline, Labeling

a , Schematic of the principal contributors to striatal D2/3 ligand binding: postsynaptic D2 heteroreceptors on medium spiny neurons (MSNs; red) and presynaptic D2 autoreceptors on dopamine axons (blue). b , Breeding strategy generating littermates with cell-type–specific Drd2 haploinsufficiency. Genotypes: control (Drd2 loxP/wt ; black), autoD2KD (Drd2 loxP/wt ; Dat IRES-Cre/wt ; blue), MSN-D2KD (Drd2 loxP/wt ; Adora2a-Cre +/– ; red), and double-D2KD (Drd2 flox/wt ; Adora2a-Cre +/– ; Dat IRES-Cre/wt ; purple). Bottom, RT–qPCR quantification of Drd2 mRNA (ΔΔCt) in frontal cortex (open), nucleus accumbens (NAc; dark), and dorsal striatum (light) (n = 5 control; n = 3–5 autoD2KD; n = 5 MSN-D2KD; n = 3–5 double-D2KD). c, e , Representative autoradiographs of [3H]raclopride binding (c) and [3H]SCH23390 binding (e), including nonspecific binding. Color scale indicates nCi/g. Autoradiography was performed in two independent cohorts, each with its own control group; representative control images are therefore shown twice. d, f , Left, schematic of striatal regions of interest used for quantification. Right, specific binding in dorsal striatum and NAc, normalized to the mean of the corresponding control region, for [3H]raclopride (d) and [3H]SCH23390 (f). Symbols denote individual mice; bars show mean ± s.e.m. For binding quantification, n = 3–9 mice per genotype; 8–12 sections per mouse; 24–30 ROIs per animal. *P ≤ 0.05; #0.1 ≥ P > 0.05.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: D2 autoreceptors gate vulnerability to cocaine use disorder

doi: 10.64898/2026.03.10.710882

Figure Lengend Snippet: a , Schematic of the principal contributors to striatal D2/3 ligand binding: postsynaptic D2 heteroreceptors on medium spiny neurons (MSNs; red) and presynaptic D2 autoreceptors on dopamine axons (blue). b , Breeding strategy generating littermates with cell-type–specific Drd2 haploinsufficiency. Genotypes: control (Drd2 loxP/wt ; black), autoD2KD (Drd2 loxP/wt ; Dat IRES-Cre/wt ; blue), MSN-D2KD (Drd2 loxP/wt ; Adora2a-Cre +/– ; red), and double-D2KD (Drd2 flox/wt ; Adora2a-Cre +/– ; Dat IRES-Cre/wt ; purple). Bottom, RT–qPCR quantification of Drd2 mRNA (ΔΔCt) in frontal cortex (open), nucleus accumbens (NAc; dark), and dorsal striatum (light) (n = 5 control; n = 3–5 autoD2KD; n = 5 MSN-D2KD; n = 3–5 double-D2KD). c, e , Representative autoradiographs of [3H]raclopride binding (c) and [3H]SCH23390 binding (e), including nonspecific binding. Color scale indicates nCi/g. Autoradiography was performed in two independent cohorts, each with its own control group; representative control images are therefore shown twice. d, f , Left, schematic of striatal regions of interest used for quantification. Right, specific binding in dorsal striatum and NAc, normalized to the mean of the corresponding control region, for [3H]raclopride (d) and [3H]SCH23390 (f). Symbols denote individual mice; bars show mean ± s.e.m. For binding quantification, n = 3–9 mice per genotype; 8–12 sections per mouse; 24–30 ROIs per animal. *P ≤ 0.05; #0.1 ≥ P > 0.05.

Article Snippet: Relative dopamine D2 receptor (Oa04895884_m1 TaqMan, Catalog #: 4351372 ) and beta-actin probe (Mm01205647_g1 TaqMan, Catalog #: 4331182) mRNA expression were determined with TaqMan Gene Expression Assays (Life Technologies) using a StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems).

Techniques: Ligand Binding Assay, Control, Quantitative RT-PCR, Binding Assay, Autoradiography